Play Fantasy Use your Fantasy skills to win Cash Prizes. Join or start a league today. Play Now
 
Tag:Arizona State University
Posted on: June 19, 2009 1:58 pm
Edited on: June 19, 2009 4:31 pm
 

NBA Draft Prospect: PF Jeff Pendergraph, ASU

Jeff Pendergraph: 6-9, 240, PF, Sr. (Arizona State University)

Draft Rank: #26

PF Rank: #6

Strengths:

Steady power forward who isn't afraid to mix it up down low and do the dirty work. Has a soft touch around the rim and from the foul line on in. Does a good job of transitioning from the post to face up and turn into a mid-range shooter. Really takes pride in beating his man down the floor and setting up shop in the post. Has a good, solid frame and strength to play the 4 at the next level. Gets up to the rim very quickly and has good explosiveness when in the paint. Makes good shot selections. He knows his role as a big and doesn't try to play on the perimeter.

Does a good job of attacking the boards with two hands. Has great length for a big man. Seals his man and puts his hands out to make him a target for passes. Is constantly working in the post. Excels at setting picks. Has the ability to finish even when he is pushed into a tough angle under the basket. Likes to initiate contact in the post and doesn't back away from physical play. Does a good job of slipping to the paint after setting picks. 

He can take a hit with the body and still finish around the rim. Takes advantage of smaller players when they are switched to him. Does a good job resealing his man when he can't get position the first time. Due to his size he should be able to play some center at the next level. Good motor and does well moving without the ball in his hands. Knows how to play alongside a great player. Has a nice one-handed shot that he hits with regularity along the baseline from the post. Very good hands. Does a great job of running and finishing on transition. Was an anchor in the paint for a team that basically surrounded him with four guards.

Weaknesses:

Isn't dominant in one area of his game. Needs to improve his pick-and-pop capabilities. Has limited range on his jump shot. Doesn't have the ability to handle outside of the paint. Needs to improve his passing. Is often predictable as to where he is going once he receives the ball in the paint. Needs to be quicker in his decision making in the paint. Needs to improve his footwork in the paint, including a better drop-step move that can get him going toward the basket rather than fading away for jump shots.  Often relies on size and strength in college instead of good post moves to get his baskets. Defensively it's tough to judge him because of the matchup zone that ASU played, but he isn't a good shot blocker and often struggled when he got quick fouls.

Mental:

His motor and hard work on the floor is often what allows him to score. I love the way he puts his head down and just runs up the floor to catch his opponent off guard. Furthermore, while Harden struggled in the tourney, Pendergraph was a consistent rock until he ran into foul trouble against Syracuse. I also love that he understands his role and knows his limitations. Mentally, Pendergraph isn't bothered by who he is going up against and brings the same intensity night in and night out. Has a tendency to get into foul trouble.

Comparison: Kurt Thomas, 6-9, 235, PF/C

Would be a good fit for: Cleveland Cavaliers, Memphis Grizzlies, or Chicago Bulls

Conclusion:

Pendergraph does so many positive things on the floor it's hard not to like his game. In a world where many of today's 4s think they are guards, Pendergraph knows his role as a big man down low. All he does is efficiently produce, which is what a team should ask for from a guy who translates as a backup big in the NBA. Does he have the all-around offensive game that teams look for in a starting 4? Probably not. But he will rebound, play defense, set picks, bang down low and run his opponent ragged. Not to mention he measured out with legitimate big-man size.

As for comparisons. He could end up like a Lawrence Roberts-type who never really produced in the NBA, but I believe he will end up being more like a Kurt Thomas or even a Tony Battie type of player. Sure he needs to work on his jumper to become as reliable as Thomas has been over his career, but he has the form to become better from out there and his physical play reminds me of Thomas.   

I think Pendergraph is the classic case of a guy who will get overlooked because teams will look at all of his limitations. But the bottom line is that his positives far outweigh his negatives. He is solid all around and while he may not wow you with athleticism or the ability to go inside and out, he is a true power forward. I really like Pendergraph as a guy who is NBA ready and will find a way to contribute and get easy buckets for a team. I think he would look very good in Cleveland as he would help them in the post and give them somebody who understands how to get open when playing with a superstar.

Posted on: May 11, 2009 3:47 pm
Edited on: May 14, 2009 4:44 pm
 

NBA Draft Prospects: SG James Harden, ASU

James Harden : 6-5, 216, So,   SG (Arizona State University)

Draft Rank: #4

SG Rank: #1

Strengths:

Very good scorer. Can get to the rim with ease once he establishes a jab step. Uses the entire floor to get to where he wants. Understands spacing. Has a great floater and in-between game. Uses the glass  well when he needs to. Uses the shot fake to get his man up in the air and then attacks. Very quick decision maker which allows him to find the open man and be a good distributor with the ball in his hands. Does a good job of getting his defender on his hip and drawing fouls once he has his man beat. Really understands angles and how to shield the defender from the ball. Has good arc on his shot. Quick release. Does a great job of waiting for a pick and then using it to become a scoring threat in the paint. Good catch-and-shoot player. Does a great job of cutting without the ball.  Good rebounder for a guard. Very good defensive player. Gets a lot of steals, which lead to easy buckets on the other end. Plays with calmness and relaxed temperament that allows him to use all of his energy doing what he is best at doing -- scoring. High basketball IQ. Does a great job of getting to the rim and putting his body into the opponent to draw contact and get to the line. Very efficient basketball player.

Weaknesses:

Doesn't have great length for a two guard. Doesn't have great quickness or playmaking ability to separate from the defender. Doesn't have elite athleticism. Is used to the offense going through him and needs touches in order to be effective. Is careless at times with the ball, which leads to bad turnovers. Sometimes takes plays off and hurts his team. Turns the ball over at a high level. Doesn't do a gr eat job of creating for himself on the perimeter.

Mental:

Is unfazed by his surroundings and who he is playing against. He plays his game no matter what is happening. However, he doesn't appear to have the killer instinct that would allow a team to put the ball in his hands at the end of the game. He really struggled in the NCAA tourney and I worry that he will have some similar struggles when he gets to the rigors of the NBA game. His shooting percentages actually went down this year, which isn't the steady improvement you would like to see from a top-five player.

Extra info:
-- Won an AAU tournament championship. Led his team to victory against a team made up of Michael Beasley, Nolan Smith and Austin Freeman.
-- 2009 Pac 10 Player of the Year.

Comparison: Michael Redd, 6-6, 220, SG

Would be a good fit for: LA Clippers, Oklahoma City Thunder, or Minnesota Timberwolves

Conclusion:

Harden knows how to play the game. He is a prototypical shooting guard and he has a lot of the characteristics that you look for in a go to scorer. He makes his teammates better and can carry the load, and I think he is capable of being a secondary scorer at the next level. His ability to play the game the right way is clear, but I worry that some of his skills will not translate in the NBA. The athleticism is a concern as he will be playing every day against the best athletes in the game. I also am worried about his performance in the tourney this past year. He really seemed frustrated and content with not competing at the highest level. The very best players step up when the lights are shining on them and Harden didn't do so. While that was disappointing, I did see him take over games numerous times this year. 

The comparison to Redd does have flaws, as I see Harden as more of a mid-range player than a three-point threat. But they do have very similar numbers when you break down each player's production on the college level. Redd averages 4.6 three-point attempts in the NBA and has shot 38.6 percent career from long distance. He also averages about 5.1 free-throw attempts and about 29 percent of his shots are from long range. In his sophomore year Redd averaged the exact same amount of rebounds, 1.8 less assists, .6 less points and .3 less steals than Harden.  Surprisingly, Harden also shot a better percentage from three-point land at 35.6 percent to Redd's 34.1 percent. Also, surprisingly Harden averaged almost one more three pointer per game than Redd did his sophomore year.  As for free-throw shooting, Harden has a career average of 75.5 percent to Redd's college numbers of 65 percent. Furthermore, Harden got to the line 1.6 more times than Redd did in college. I don't always put that much value in statistics, but I was shocked to see how similar their production was and to see how Harden's college numbers were better than Redd's nearly across the board. Then again, Redd is a perfect example of a guy who improved his game and worked at becoming a better shooter once he got into the NBA.

Harden has such a good feel for the game and he understands his strengths. In the NBA guys are really limited on the perimeter as to how physical they can play and I think Harden will be able to take advantage of this. The best players in the NBA know that getting to the line is key and I think Harden will really do a good job of penetrating and getting to the foul line.  His ability to put the ball in the basket and be a handful for his opponents is unquestioned, but he will have to improve his drive and will to win if he wants to be a consistent go-to guy in the NBA. 



 
 
 
 
The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com